Table of Contents | |
|
Dobi-Dawn Frenette's Presentation at KERC Summer Institutes 2011 The FNSSP has three interrelated components: school success plans, studentlearning assessments and performance measurement There are four FNSSP projects in NAN. NAN partners, Sandy Lake, Matawa and Mushkegowuk This FNSSP project serves 4437 students in 27 schools We have six main organization partners focusing on implementation: KERC, KNET, NNEC, K.O., Shibogama, NAN. In addition to this we have the support of IFNA and Windigo as well In year one we received: $3 million 27 dollars In year two we received: $ 4.5 million In year three we were informed that we would only receive $4.25 million, a decrease from the previous year INAC (AANDC) has not confirmed that our year three budget will be $5.0 million We have submitted a proposal for $6 million, but are still waiting to hear back The FNSSP does not employ a regional/per capita based model to determine funding. Each proposal is judged independently and on its own merits. Funding levels are determined by the strength, feasibility and cost effectiveness of the approved submissions. While there is no fixed minimum or maximum amount of funding per applicant, amounts are determined taking into account factors such as the number of schools and students participating, geographic location (isolation), and total funding available. Performance Indicators Performance measurement identifies indicators to measure success and progress towards the goals of literacy, numeracy, student retention and other goals as identified in the school success plan. Performance indicators will meet the following criteria: · Be result-oriented. · Include at a minimum the core indicators below. · Be comparable to those used in the provincial system. · Be capable of monitoring student progress against a standard for literacy, numeracy and student retention. · Be cost-efficient (the costs to collect the information will be justifiable relative to the usefulness of the data). Recipients may develop and track a variety of indicators. However, at a minimum, performance measurement will include the initial set of core indicators listed below. These core indicators may evolve or change over the course of the Program based on consultation with Program recipients and ongoing research into best practices and comparison with provincial outcomes. 1. Monthly Attendance Rate: · Monthly attendance rate = the number of days attended by the student divided by the total number of teaching days in a month multiplied by 100. 2. Graduation Rate: · Graduation rate = the number of students who graduate in June divided by (the number of students registered in September minus the number of students whose reason for leaving was transfer to another school, serious long-term illness or death) multiplied by 100 for each graduating year (e.g. grades 6, 8, 12, 11 in Quebec, etc). 3. Retention rate: · Calculated annually for each grade from K-4 to grade 12 (grade 11 in Quebec) · Drop-out rate = number of students attending school in June divided by (the number of students registered in September minus the number of students whose reason for leaving was transfer to another school, serious long-term illness or death) multiplied by 100. 4. Literacy: · Annual literacy test results for applicable provincial standardized tests compared with results in previous years (number of students who met/did not meet provincial or grade level standards; number of eligible students in grade level by gender; and number of eligible students in grade level who took the test by gender). 5. Numeracy: · Annual numeracy test results for applicable provincial standardized tests compared with results in previous years (number of students who met/did not meet provincial or grade level standards; number of eligible students in grade level by gender; and number of eligible students in grade level who took the test by gender). |